Typeface or Font Readability
Which typeface (or font if you prefer it that way) is the easiest to read, especially by
less-accomplished readers?
You hear and read ‘evidence’ that such-and-such a font, or such-and-such a point size, is required for optimum readability. It’s nonsense, but you try telling the person who knows all about it that! After being presented such bar-stool wisdom so often I decided to give some thought to it and write these pages and give some links.
There is no ‘best’ or ‘easiest-to-read’ font or font
type or font size.
These pages give some background and support to why I am able
to state this so categorically. And I’m not alone. See The Typographer as Reader, by Will Hill on the Linotype Font Lounge.
Pages:
And in Colour? (You really should see my text colour readability page)
Mr Pirde thought long and hard
And bought then for his desk at home.
A new computer – shiny clean!
Next he had to learn the ways
But he had been to school.
There he’d learned that if you learned
The rights and wrongs you will succeed
And he who asks will get reward.
Roofless Ruth was there at hand,
An expert, she, in all that moved.
She lifted her red-painted nail
And pointed it at Mr Pirde.
There are rules, she said,
And them that fails them
Will be told they’ve done it wrong.
See those fonts that drop down manifold
And their sizes, there to choose;
If you don’t select these right
Your writings will be hard to read
For those of limited faculties.
Gosh! said Mr Pirde, I’m so impressed
With your wealth of certainty!
Yes, said Ruth, I have been told these things
Determinedly by clever folks.
Mr Pirde now knew, he had a rule
And he could rest contentedly,
For uncertainties and things that have no bounds
Are really, really scary.
And now for something really sensible
If you have read these pages, you should have come to believe that there is no such thing as a ‘best’ typeface. And to prove it to your boss, who probably knows for sure that there is, you can show him or her the demonstration of typestyle in relation to fashions in clothing, that you can find at www.linotype.com/2258-16895/fashionandtypeface.html. Now does your boss still believe that only Comic Sans will do? Oh, well, you’d better use Comic Sans, then. That dumb boss.
And further reading about legibility? You can’t do better than this: www.linotype.com/ 2258-16905/ aboutlegibility.html
And in colour?
There’s also the issue of readability of different colours of text on different hues and shades of background. This complicates the subject rather, and I’m in the process of building up some pages on this. You can make a start with my text colour readability page and you can accompany this with experiments using TypeTester.
Essentially, when looking at colour readability, the hue (eg red, green, blue etc) is of minimal importance; far more important for readability is the relative brightness of text against background. That is to say, that red on green is perfectly readable (despite what your teacher said) provided it’s a light red against a dark green or vice versa. You really should see my text colour readability page. Have fun!

5 comments:
A minority of dyslexics have visual problems that cause reading difficulties.These are small-scale problems that do improve with increased print size.
A common problem is when parts of letters or words seem to be bleached out with light.This is fixed in size so that when the letter size is doubled more of letter or word is visible.
Given that about 10% of the population is dyslexic and about 10% of the dyslexic population is visually dyslexic we are actually talking about 1% of the general population.
Reading fluency that increases with increased exercise is actually fairly predictive of visual dyslexia. Since most dyslexics are not visually dyslexic ,text size and reading fluency are generally seem as unrelated.
The good news is there is a visual dyslexia solution with See Right Dyslexia Glasses that are marketed to visual dyslexics that can describe the visual problems that make reading difficult.
Lovely page - and very useful!
Useful
However, another thing to note is the difference in resolution of the images of characters in printing compared with computer screens.
Computer screens are far lower resolution, so serifs sometimes look fuzzy on a screen, whereas they look clear and beautifully readable printed out on a high-res printer.
Great site, and fun to read, but in order to see it properly, in both Firefox and Safari, I have to stretch it very wide.
I have several blogspot blogs myself, and I've noticed some of the templates are like that, while others allow me to use a much smaller part of my screen.
I've just been trawling the web, for what I'd have thought would be some conclusive research on colours and readability. But alas I've found nothing conclusive.
Just to say that I really struggle with black on white. So much so, that I now just over ride the author's styles on a website.
Thanks for sharing.
Post a Comment